Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/02/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 03:01 PM 2/26/2003 +0100, Nathan Wajsman (private) wrote: >...Fundamentally, I just fail to see the point of spending $1600 on an M6 >or $2200 on an M7 (or whatever the price is these days) and then putting >some ancient non-Leica lenses on them to save money. >.... It's not for saving money per se (but I suppose that never hurts), but more like to see if there are some "favorite" lens that deserve a 2nd chance in life, so to speak. I mean don't some leicaphiles think the older M lens have more glow or characaters? Or that some people think the Zeiss glass have more warmth? I guess I am a gadget head in that sense. Thanks. // richard <http://www.imagecraft.com> <http://www.dragonsgate.net/mailman/listinfo> On-line orders, support, and listservers available on web site. [ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all previous replies in your msgs. ] - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html