Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/02/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Digital - Rumor Mongering apologies to Mark R.
From: "bdcolen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 10:30:16 -0500

Tina - The need for large file sizes is NOT exaggerated if you want to
produce decent size prints at good resolution. First off, while
newspapers can and do use small files because they print at low
resolution, I know that when I wrote and shot a story for Newsday last
summer, they wanted files of 11 meg, which while not huge, are hardly
small.

And while we all think chromes and high-res when we think of magazines,
I'd be surprised to learn than Newsweek is printing at 300 dpi - and it
wouldn't surprise me to learn that the res. on their cover is lower than
that.

The fact that you sold a Digilux file to Newsweek - Congrats by the way,
on the Newsweek sale! :-) - hardly tells us anything about digital,
Digilux, or anything other than the fact that you're an excellent
photographer. After all, at least one Pulitzer Prize for spot news
photography went to a photo shot with a  Kodak Brownie.

Not wanting to be a pain in the ass - much - but I think this might be a
time for us to be reminded that you do work for Leica, including making
presentations on the Digilux. The reality here is that the Digilux is a
high-end digital P&S, which some people love and which some reviewers
don't love - but whether it is or isn't a great P&S, it is hardly a
camera that most photojournalists would consider as a main digital
camera.

With all due respect and admiration for your outstanding abilities as a
photographer, and for your wonderful qualities as a person and as a LUG
anchor. :-)

B. D.

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Tina
Manley
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 8:56 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: [Leica] Digital - Rumor Mongering apologies to Mark R.


At 02:15 PM 2/20/2003 -0800, Mark wrote:

>Calumet just sends me this brochure comparing all the digital cameras 
>in a concise visual manner and the DIGILUX compares will to the rest of

>the "consumer" digital cameras. Slightly smaller fileside. The window 
>in the back twice as large.
>

And the need for large file sizes is greatly exaggerated.  One of best 
selling news photographers said that he always shoots at the highest 
possible compression because the time between photos is so much shorter
and 
so many more photos fit on a card.  He says that the smallest size files

have been used as magazine covers with no problems.  I sold a Digilux
file 
to Newsweek!!  ;-)

Tina


Tina Manley, ASMP
http://www.tinamanley.com

photos available from:
http://www.pdiphotos.com
http://www.mira.com
http://www.agpix.com
http://www.newscom.com





- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Bill Satterfield <cwsat@istate.net> (Re: [Leica] Digital - Rumor Mongering apologies to Mark R.)