Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/02/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] The Wall Street JOURNAL and a country lawyer :)
From: "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 23:12:50 -0500

> Shouldn't that be "where a conservative trusts society to be capable of
> handling such on its own and that rich people need to have big tax
> cuts." :)

Jim,

There are a few things "wrong" with that statement.  First, anyone who
actually makes any money is considered "rich" by the Libs/Dems.  Second,
well, yeah, the people who actually pay more taxes, much less even pay any
at all, will get the biggest, dollar wise, break.

I hear "so and so funding is getting cut"...but the reality is it isn't
getting cut, the INCREASE is getting cut.  It's that kind of gaming that
gets me peeved...and then there's the "baby shield" and the "scare the old
geezers" tactic...

You know, what is "is" anyway?

Austin

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Jim Hemenway <Jim@hemenway.com> (Re: [Leica] The Wall Street JOURNAL and a country lawyer :))