Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/02/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Does this mean we can't talk about Leicas?????
From: Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@pacbell.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 14:04:01 -0800
References: <000e01c2d2c4$55ea5a00$c2464541@machineatem39c> <3E4AC104.5D9AF078@hemenway.com>

Jim

We all (most of us) knew that, but BD Colen's link was
not a spoof.  Ask him about it.

Jerry

Jim Hemenway wrote:

> Folks this isn't real
>
> The server address, www.homelandsecurity.gov@subj.com, makes you think
> that it's an official government address, but it's not.  In
> fact, the www.homelandsecurity.gov section is actually interpreted as a
> username at the server subj.com.
>
> Go to the url:
>
> http://www.homelandsecurity.gov@subj.com/dhs/
>
> Look at the sidebars about F16s for schools program and NSA secret
> hideout
>
> Jim - http://www.hemenway.com
>
> Kelly wrote:
> >
> >  Department of Homeland Security
> > "For a Safe and Secure NationT"
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Clampdown on Internet Subversives
> > - President says "we must stop this evil spread of ideas"
> >
> >  Washington 2/5/03
> >
> >
> >
> > In a far reaching announcement today, President Bush announced that an
> > imminent clampdown into the dissemination of subversive and dangerous
> > ideas via the Internet.
> >
> > Announcing this new initiative alongside director Tom Ridge, the
> > president said: "We must stop this evil spread of ideas. Far too many
> > people are being exposed to thoughts and concepts that challenge those
> > things this administration stands for. The Internet is clearly an
> > example of outmoded liberal ideas gone badly out of control."
> >
> > Director Ridge added: "It is unfair for the federal government to pass
> > the burden of this onto tax-payers and citizens. Instead, we are
> > proposing that the cost be shared between web site publishers and those
> > minority of the population who visit such things. Screening this
> > information is expensive and those costs must be passed on."
> >
> > The proposed charges will be in the region of $100 per web page to be
> > analysed for content and 10 cents per page viewed by visitors, this
> > charge will go towards an upgrade to the Carnivore systems already in
> > place. Sites belonging to government agencies are exempt, as are sites
> > belong to Fortune 500 companies - Director Ridge said "We can trust
> > major corporations to always act in the interests of the United States,
> > so we do not propose to screen their content. However, in the current
> > climate of terrorist threats we must consider everyone else to be a
> > potential subversive".
> >
> > Charges will be levied after 31st March 2003. For any queries or
> > comments, please contact our press office.
> >
> > This article is http://www.homelandsecurity.gov@subj.com/dhs/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Kelly <j2kelly3@swbell.net> ([Leica] Does this mean we can't talk about Leicas?????)
Message from Jim Hemenway <jim@hemenway.com> (Re: [Leica] Does this mean we can't talk about Leicas?????)