Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/02/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]John Collier wrote: > Taking care of Passport matters for gear you have sold is more > commonly called fraud. Is it technically fraud? If the passport service is valid only (a) for a specified piece of equipment, (b) to a specified person, and (c) for a maximum period of three years from the date of purchase, then if that person claims service for that piece of equipment within three years of its initial purchase, how does it constitute fraud? Does it explicitly say in the Passport legalese that you have to be the owner? Or does it only state that the Passport service is only available to the "original owner"? The orginal owner is still the orginal owner, even after having sold it. M. - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html