Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2003/01/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Neopan 1600
From: Steve Barbour <kididdoc@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 07:03:37 -0700
References: <20030122145753.GA6119@panix.com> <5.1.1.6.0.20030122104236.009f36a0@pop-server.twcny.rr.com> <20030122164458.GC6119@panix.com> <3E2F87DD.5010908@webshuttle.ch> <008f01c2c33c$59729210$0200a8c0@c439786a> <OE34TjKVS2vUtqbPCRO000181bf@hotmail.com> <3E30CCBC.2090406@webshuttle.ch>
I have been told to shoot it at 1000 or 1200 and develop
normally...any experience with this approach? Steve
>Eric,
>
>I rate it at 1600.
>
>Nathan
>
>faneuil wrote:
>>Bit confused with the neopan thread.
>>
>>So is rating it at 800-1200 a good thing?
>>
>>I have a lab do my developing.
>>If I shoot it at 800 should I tell them to 'pull' it?
>>
>>Eric
>>
>--
>Nathan Wajsman
>Herrliberg (ZH), Switzerland
>
>e-mail: wajsman@webshuttle.ch
>mobile: +41 78 732 1430
>
>Photo-A-Week: http://www.wajsman.com/indexpaw2002.htm
>General photo site: http://www.wajsman.com/index.htm
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
- --
Steve Barbour
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
Replies:
Reply from Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch> (Re: [Leica] Re: Neopan 1600)
Reply from Rei Shinozuka <shino@panix.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Neopan 1600)
In reply to:
Message from Rei Shinozuka <shino@panix.com> ([Leica] niagra falls)
Message from Ernest Nitka <enitka@twcny.rr.com> (Re: [Leica] niagra falls)
Message from Rei Shinozuka <shino@panix.com> (Re: [Leica] niagra falls)
Message from Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch> ([Leica] Re: Noepan 1600 (WAS: niagra falls))
Message from "Phil Leeson" <pjleeson@mchsi.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Neopan 1600)
Message from "faneuil" <leica_korenman@hotmail.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Neopan 1600)
Message from Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch> (Re: [Leica] Re: Neopan 1600)