Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/01/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 6:49 PM -0500 1/14/03, Austin Franklin wrote: >Hi Henning, > >> Technique has nothing to do with it. > >Yes, it absolutely does. I don't understand what the fuss is about, it >doesn't require a friggin' correction table, just a little understanding. > >There are TWO different possibilities. One is you focus on the subject >using the center of the rangefinder, as you should, then you re-frame. The >second is there is nothing to get a good focus on the subject, so you "find" >something to focus on, believing it is the same distance from you as the >subject. > >The plane of focus is an arc with the "anchor" point at the center of the >film plane, and the radius the distance to the subject. As long as you KNOW >that and use that to focus, there is NO changing of focus to accommodate >this. > >The first scenario above, where you focus on the subject, then re-frame the >camera expecting the subject to stay in focus IT WILL WITH NO FIRTHER >THOUGHT, as the subject distance has not changed. > >For the second scenario, you simply find a spot along the arc that is the >same distance from you to focus on. I don't know about you, but it is FAR >easier for me to judge something is the same distance away from me, than >judging if it is coplanar with the subject! > >Austin > Austin, you've missed the point. - -- * Henning J. Wulff /|\ Wulff Photography & Design /###\ mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com |[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html