Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/01/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Ah, welcome to the GSL - Grammar and Spelling List... ;-) - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Jerry Lehrer Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 4:48 PM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: [Leica] Why fashion photography sucks Kim Do all those photographers listed spell their names with lower case letters? I thought that ee cummings was the only person worthy of that. Jerry Teresa299@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 1/5/03 12:17:56 PM, bdcolen@earthlink.net writes: > > << Amen! To say nothing of the fact that much of the most successful > and popular fashion photography serves up the degrading, the > 'degenerate,' the pathetic and the 'perverse' as that to which we > should all aspire - remember 'heroin chic?' Sexually provocative poses > by underage models, or those who look under age? Certainly there's > allot of creative fashion photography - and I assume that Martin is > referring to studio type fashion work, Ted, not shooting runway > models. But the question is how that creativity is being used. It's a > lonnnnnng way from early Avedon to the Calvin Klein underwear ads. > > B. D. >> > > > > I'm running through my mind who I think are some of the most > successful current fashion photographers and the images they serve up. > The names that come to mind are steven meisel, pablo roversi, > demarchalier, michel comte, david lachapelle, bruce weber, mario > testino, ellen von unwerth, bettina rheims, walter chin, sarah moon, > avedon, ritts (ok so he's not current anymore)....I'm sure there are > many others...but of those listed I'm having a hard time thinking of > their work as serving up "the degrading, the 'degenerate,' the > pathetic and the 'perverse' ." > > Creativity is often stunted and altered in the face of commercial > (particularly advertising) issues....this isn't just the case in > fashion photography. It seems to be the nature of the beast where as > an artist attempting to survive off your art, you must be reasonably attuned to the > hand (or in this case client) who is feeding you. But it seems to me that > condemning all (or even "much of")fashion photography because of > heroin chic or underware ads is kinda like condeming all of hip hop > because of gangsta rap. > > Kim > -- > To unsubscribe, see > http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html