Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/12/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Regarding http://quazynet.no-ip.org/PAW/PAW28.htm Bill wrote: "Keep trying! :-) " Okay. Better stuff next time. Ernie wrote: "Eggleston like." Bingo! "The others just remind me of my backyard and it is so depressing that I have to look away." Understood. You know, rather than easy-to-like stuff, I like to put up pictures that I'm not sure how to regard with hopes a few of you will chime in. Like in Stan Freeburg's musical, 'United States of America,' George Washington says to Betsy Ross after criticizing the new flag, "Well, we'll run it up the flagpole ... see if anybody salutes." Sometimes I'm surprised that ones only a father could like aren't too ugly to others, either. Not surprised if told to go soak my head. "MUST use a tripod so that things are tac sharp." HCB: "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." I agree with the others - if detail is important, use a bigger negative. But, I don't think you can't do good landscapes on 35. Look at Graham's. You just can't make 'em really big or count the pine needles. So what? Little prints are great. You can hold them in your hand; put them under your pillow. Yeah, using a tripod is a totally different approach and intent. And result. Glad it works for him. The flip side of working too fast to fully understand the subject is producing photos that are too studied, static or all about lines and formalities. I own a tripod. It spent two years in my trunk getting scratched up by empty beer bottles rather than supporting my Rollei. Used it last month for an outdoor portrait session with the M2. After the first set up, I left it behind. I'd like to get a monopod. That seems like a useful thing for a small camera. Tripods remind me of long, tedious days shooting paintings under spotlights with an RB67. Yuck! Carl P.S. Happy New Year, everyone! - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html