Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/12/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]tim - you're correct about Moonrise - it is the most financially successful print of AA. It was a grab shot with literally a minute or two to spare. The story goes that AA had only one plate left to shoot with, didn't have his light meter handy and based on his knowledge of all things Zone knew how to expose for the moon and hence the exposure was made - it is also true that the negative requires all that the darkroom person has to give in order to get the print that we know as moonrise - sort of negating the concept that his exposure was dead on. while we are on the OT topic of bashing photogs named adams ( could be a new web site but who has the time!) anyone have an opinion about robert Adams the landscape photog - i initially got interested in him because of a few good photos taken in and around the area that i lived in as a child. After that everything else I've seen of his appears to be crap. " thats just my opinion I could be wrong" - anyone else wish to take the bait? ernie nitka On Friday, December 6, 2002, at 10:13 PM, Tim Atherton wrote: >> I saw an original print of "Moonrise" at the AA Gallery in Curry >> Village in > > Moonrise is probably his most successful and least typical "Adams" like > shot - it was basically a "grab" shot (as much as you can with LF) > and, as I > recall, a difficult negative (not at all "pre-visualised"). > Interesting that > it should be one of his best pictures. > > Maybe he should have loosened up a bit and dumped all the > pre-visualisation > and zone stuff and let it all hang out.... > > tim > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > http://www.ernienitka.com - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html