Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/12/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Is this believable?
From: "Sam Krneta" <skrneta@mindspring.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 18:34:00 -0600

Why? I find this very pertinent as most of us do take photographs. I'd
like to gain some insight into what is acceptable and what is not in the
pursuit of these photographs. And so far 13 other people seem to find it
of some interest. Can you just skip over the thread? 

Thank you,
Sam Krneta


- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Robert G.
Stevens
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 12:33 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us; leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: RE: [Leica] Is this believable?

Can we take this whole thread off list?

Regards,

Robert

At 01:03 PM 12/6/2002 -0500, Austin Franklin wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I'm asking what law states that I am under arrest by default?  I don't
>believe that is true.  You have to break a law to be under arrest, and
being
>under arrest requires telling you why you are under arrest, as well as
the
>reading of your Miranda Rights...I believe.
>
>I also do not believe walking away from a supposed officer, who
believes he
>has "engaged" you, is a crime.  Perhaps it is...but I'd like to see the
>actual written law that states that.  I just don't blindly believe
these
>type of things without some better understanding.
>
>Austin
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of S
Dimitrov
> > Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 12:48 PM
> > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> > Subject: Re: [Leica] Is this believable?
> >
> >
> > How do you know he's not involved in some kind of fact finding?
Besides,
> > try walking away, when you have been stopped, or engaged in some
way.
> > Once stopped by an officer, that is an act of arrest.
> > Slobodan
> >
> > Austin Franklin wrote:
> > >
> > > > Technically, once an officer of the law stops you, even to
> > ask about the
> > > > weather, you're under arrest until_he_decides
> > the_conversation_is over.
> > >
> > > Hi Slobodan,
> > >
> > > Where did you get that from?
> > >
> > > Austin
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html