Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/11/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I'm with you on this one. But I still think that the 28mm 'cron is waisted on the M, it deserves to be on the R. Slobodan Dimitrov bdcolen wrote: > > To each his own, John...While I actually think the old 135 2.8 with eyes > was a pretty good rig - and a much underrate lens - when I shoot with a > longer lens, I want the view through the lens. In fact, I prefer the > reflex for pretty much anything over 50mm, and see the Leica 90s as fall > backs for when I need near silence when shooting. > > But I am well aware that mine very much a minority opinion - on this > list ;-) > > B. D. > h - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html