Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/10/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] PAW -- Criticism or Stroking?
From: "Andrew Amundsen" <andy@tcinternet.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 11:45:15 -0600

Joe, I really like this approach you have suggested. I hope others will pick
up on something along these lines.

Sincerly, Andrew Amundsen

>From: "Joseph Codispoti" <joecodi@clearsightusa.com> wrote(snip):
> I think that if the photographer is submitting a photo for criticism, the
> submission announcement could/should be accompanied by a form requesting
> criticism.
> The form, to be filled by respondents, should say, at a minimum:
>
> Title:
> Strong Points:
> Weak points:
> Points to improve:
> Overall artistic rating (1-10):
> Overall technical rating (1-10):
>
> With such a form (or similar), the criticism would cover much of what a
> picture is about. Furthermore, the critic would be compelled to cover all
> points and not just "awesome".



- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html