Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/10/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: SBLOO finder magnification: Was: [Leica] .58x or .72x?
From: Dennis Painter <dennis@hale-pohaku.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 19:57:01 -0700
References: <154843BA-E820-11D6-8900-0050E42E6E0B@shaw.ca>

Hi John,

The operative word is I "had" the SBLOO. I didn't use glasses so cannot
comment on the eye relief but it was much easier to view than the IIIc built
in finder. I do recall there was almost nothing around the framelines. It was
not hard to use with both eyes open. I expect it is a lot like the new 35
finder you bought. Too bad Leica doesn't want to continue to make it.

I also had a 50mm bright line finder, the SBOOI/12015 true 1:1, with both
eyes open the brightline frame just floated in front of you. The 50, 85, 90,
and 135 brightline finders were all 1:1.

Dennis

John Collier wrote:

> Aha! I figured all the references I saw to 0.7x could not be wrong.
> What is the eye relief like? Can you see much around the framelines?
> Can you easily use it with glasses? I have an 0.58x now but I am still
> curious...
>
> Thanks,
>
> John
>
> On Thursday, October 24, 2002, at 11:47 PM, Dennis Painter wrote:
>
> > I used to have the SBLOO and it's 0.7x. I don't think anyone ever made
> > a
> > 1:1 35mm finder.
> >
> > The SBLOO is a great finder, easily damaged and thus became rare enough
> > that it goes for collector prices, often to collectors.
> >
> > It's 0.7x mag pure and simple, but clear and bright!
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "daniel" <thedmc@cox.net> ([Leica] too many frames)
In reply to: Message from John Collier <jbcollier@shaw.ca> (Re: SBLOO finder magnification: Was: [Leica] .58x or .72x?)