Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/09/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] LUGforum and feuds?
From: "Rob Appleby" <rob@robertappleby.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 14:49:45 +0200
References: <5.1.1.6.0.20020927164744.00a37040@pop.runbox.com> <004301c26684$a81ec420$0a3aa8c0@almond> <3D950EFB.6080008@shaw.ca> <005101c266bd$c229b300$87567450@rob> <a05100303b9bb2a73c892@[62.37.66.184]>

As a temporary strategy I can understand it, but afaik it there must be over
500 subscribers who never "contribute" anything (pretty loaded word), which
seems a shame. It leaves the field open to scoundrels like myself ;-)

- -- Rob

http://www.robertappleby.com
Mobile: (+39) 348 336 7990
Home: (+39) 059 303436

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Hardy Carter" <carterph@wanadoo.es>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2002 12:17 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] LUGforum and feuds?


> Rob:
>
> I don't know if I'm lurking or not, as I have posted a few times. But I'm
new here and I'm just getting used to the ambiance or this place. All in all
I like it.
>
> There seems to be a few technical people sitting at a table by the door
occasionally raising their voices about integrity, an amiable bunch in the
middle of the room swapping travel stories and showing each other pictures,
some wheeler-dealers over there in the dark corner buying and selling stuff,
a number of folks sitting around the walls with drinks in their hands,
silently watching, and a couple of belligerent drunks at the bar trying to
start a fight.
>
> I really don't believe in walking into a new place and commencing to tell
everyone there how to behave, but some of things I've read here are
astonishing. I've always thought an email group is like a debating society,
with people putting forward propositions and hearing what other people
think, but the fundamental rule of such debates is that you only take the
floor if you have something to say that sheds new light on the subject. Some
people here seem to like the sound of their own voices a little too much,
and believe critical attack to be the highest form of intellectual
discourse.
>
> So in answer to your question - Why lurk? - I don't think of it as
lurking, just waiting until I have something useful to say on a particular
subject.
>
> Paul.
> (Hoping that he's increasing the signal and not the noise.)
>
>
> At 9:07 +0200, 28/9/02, Rob Appleby wrote:
> >I think this is the first time anything has come down the lugforum pipe
for
> >months. It never seems to get used, - maybe the concept is a bit flawed.
If
> >you start something in one forum, it seems strange to continue it in
> >another.
> >
> >I do wonder though what the silent majority are subscribed for. Why lurk?
It
> >doesn't make much sense to me.
> >
> >-- Rob
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Jeffery L.Smith" <jls@runbox.com> (Re: [Leica] LUGforum and feuds?)
Message from "Will" <wlarsen@ocsnet.net> (Re: [Leica] LUGforum and feuds?)
Message from "Greg J. Lorenzo" <gregj.lorenzo@shaw.ca> (Re: [Leica] LUGforum and feuds?)
Message from "Rob Appleby" <rob@robertappleby.com> (Re: [Leica] LUGforum and feuds?)
Message from Paul Hardy Carter <carterph@wanadoo.es> (Re: [Leica] LUGforum and feuds?)