Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/09/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 10:51 AM 9/26/02 -0400, Austin Franklin wrote: > >Obviously, Neil, you simply do not understand the significance as others do. >Not that you have to, but because you don't understand or care, doesn't mean >everyone else doesn't. <sigh> Austin, you and BD simply seem to be conspiratorial back-alley types with your approach to this. Ethics work on two levels: actual conflict-of-interest and apparent conflict-of-interest. Let us not confuse the two. Erwin's statements in the past that he was independent of Leica at the time were true at the time they were made. That he has afterwards accepted a commission from them, IF HE DID SO IN THIS CASE, doesn't mean a thing. Do you seriously expect him to contact EVERYONE on the Internet when he received payment for this, again, if he did so? Cool it, gents. How many gunmen were there in Dallas on 22 NOV 63? You guys must believe that there were seven or eight. Marc msmall@infi.net FAX: +276/343-7315 Cha robh bąs fir gun ghrąs fir! - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html