Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/09/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Pultz's PAW 9/23/02
From: Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 06:42:29 +0200
References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020923100818.026a00b0@earthlink.net>

Carl,

For me, only the first picture has the kind of slightly menacing, empty 
quality about it as you showed a few weeks ago. The church photos are in 
my view not effective on that level--they just show a church, period.

Nathan

Carl Pultz wrote:
> LUGers,
> 
> Got some architectural attempts for you this week. I'd like to know if 
> any of them are effective, particularly the two of the church.
> 
> http://quazynet.no-ip.org/PAW/PAW15.htm
> 
> Sorry if the files are slow to download. There is enough detail in each 
> of the shots that the .jpg wouldn't compress all that small before 
> things got really ugly. My server might be slow, too. Please tell me if 
> it doesn't work.
> 
> Best to all,
> 
> Carl
> 
> -- 
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> 
> 


- -- 
Nathan Wajsman
Herrliberg (ZH), Switzerland

e-mail: wajsman@webshuttle.ch
mobile: +41 78 732 1430

Photo-A-Week: http://www.wajsman.com/indexpaw2002.htm
General photo site: http://www.wajsman.com/index.htm

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Carl Pultz <cpultz@earthlink.net> ([Leica] Pultz's PAW 9/23/02)