Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/09/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]As a matter of interest, $151 invested in common, unexceptional stock in 1967, would today be worth about $3,400, given just the average, long term return on the market. Leicas are marvelous cameras, but do not represent a wise investment. Just putting the money in a low interest bank account would have brought a much better return than the lens, but would have given you no pictures! Jack C. Herron 8118 E. 20th St. Tucson, AZ 85710 520 885-6933 - ----- Original Message ----- From: <SthRosner@aol.com> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Sunday, September 01, 2002 3:23 AM Subject: Re: [Leica] Long-term value; was Portrait of Marianne = bad mistake > edseas2@shore.net writes: > > > for the owners of the vast > > majority of Japanese equipment, the value of their lenses (and > > bodies)will be but a small fraction of the sum(s) originally spent. Looked > > at in this way, it may indeed be cheaper (read "wiser") to invest in Leica > > product(s). > > e.g. In 1967 I paid $151. for my first (new) DR Summicron. I have just sold a > wonderful DR without the eyes for $475. With eyes, a good DR today is worth > $550.-$750. depending on condition. In 1967 I paid $131. for a new black > paint 35/2 Summicron. Last year I sold a like-new 35/2 8-glass silver chrome > Summicron in original bubble and box for $1,500. In black paint, it would be > worth $2,500.-3,000. > > Granted some of this is collector money talking. Granted inflation plays a > very important role here (a pack of cigarettes in 1967 cost what, $0.20? and > in 1970 I paid $8,000. for the top-of-the-line BMW 2800 that I collected at > Munich). > > But the point is that Leitz designed and Leica designs cameras and lenses to > perform at world-class-leading cutting edge levels and to a standard of > strength, reliability and longevity that makes them so desirable 40 years > later as users that knowledgeable people are willing to pay what a new one > costs today. > > Remarkable. > > Seth LaK 9 > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html