Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/08/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I have seen 3.5 Tessars and Xenars but I have not seen a 2.8 Tessar on a Rollei 35. Maybe just my ignorance... Dan K. , Roland Smith wrote: >I USE A ROLLEI 35 WITH THE 2.8 TESSAR! I find it better to have a light >meter than a rangefinder due to the short 40mm lens with a large depth of >field. > >I do not get out of focus pictures even when I use f2.8. > >One of my Rollei 35S cameras is always in my briefcase which is almost >always with me or close by. > >Roland Smith >Oakland, California >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Logan Reinwood" <reinwood007@hotmail.com> >To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> >Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 1:06 AM >Subject: [Leica] Small pocketable camera > > > > > > HI, > > > > However a M is not a big camera, it migth be too big sometimes to carry > > along. I have a lomo that I take sometimes in my pocket. But it is more >fun > > than really good, the lens is not good at least not good for making big > > prints, etc. > > > > I am thinking to buy something else, and I am considering a Rollei 35. > > The only drawback I see with the rollei is the manual guessing focsussing. > > Is that a problem? > > I was also considering a minilux, but it is almost as big as an M. > > > > What do lugger use as a smalller camera when a M is too big? > > > > any comment? > > > > TIA, logan > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. > > http://www.hotmail.com > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > > > >-- >To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html