Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/08/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] For anyone ..leica...hands
From: "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 16:02:38 +0200
References: <000401c23c75$12a8d590$2002a8c0@SAM> <006101c23c82$7bfd2d40$94a6fea9@3zlwb> <451914640.1028577072@sparky> <005701c23d29$cc4c6f70$388a8418@symkeehx5nw8g8> <002701c23d46$942bd1e0$633f4d18@gv.shawcable.net>
 
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Ted Grant" <tedgrant@shaw.ca>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2002 2:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] For anyone who still thinks that digital isn't
really...


> > > In your hands the D1,s feel like the F5 they have a taller frame<<<
>
> Interesting and how does this equate to a leica in your hands?
> ted
Well i,m still all over it ,find it especially hard not to smudge the
rangefinder,s windows all the time.
Have trouble focusing a moving object.Yes even a crawling baby is still hard
for me.
But apart from that love it.
As for equating the different brands,i dont think you really can because
they both are made for niche markets.
best regards simon


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
In reply to: Message from "Sam Krneta" <skrneta@mindspring.com> (RE: [Leica] For anyone who still thinks that digital isn't really...)
Message from "Doug Lee" <drlee9@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] For anyone who still thinks that digital isn't really...)
Message from Rolfe Tessem <rolfe@ldp.com> (Re: [Leica] For anyone who still thinks that digital isn't really...)
Message from "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl> (Re: [Leica] For anyone who still thinks that digital isn't really...)
Message from Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca> (Re: [Leica] For anyone who still thinks that digital isn't really...)