Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/08/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Shutterbug Paterson developer article
From: Jeffery Smith <jls@runbox.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2002 15:33:49 -0500
References: <r01050300-0904-3F8EFF80A0B111D6B18C54CB087F14CE@[64.1.3.78]> <5.1.1.6.0.20020731082141.00a15380@pop.runbox.com>

Let me check tonight. It may be the September issue (they're always about a 
month ahead of themselves).

At 02:40 PM 8/5/02, you wrote:
>Hi Jeffery,
>
>Which month's issue? I don't see it in the August issue.
>
>Regards,
>
>Greg
>
>Jeffery Smith wrote:
>
>>Roger Hicks just wrote an article in Shutterbug singing the praises of 
>>Paterson developers. Have any of you tried the two-bath ascorbate 
>>(non-toxic) developer?
>>
>>Jeffery
>>
>>
>>--
>>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from George Lottermoser <imagist@concentric.net> (RE: [Leica] [leica] Roger Hicks and the 21+35+90 combo?)
Message from Jeffery Smith <jls@runbox.com> ([Leica] Shutterbug Paterson developer article)