RE: [Leica] 35mm Summilux-M

["Beddoe, Neil" <nbeddoe@lehman.com>]

I can sleep soundly knowing that my Summilux ASPH is justified after all. 

- -----Original Message-----
From: Ernest Nitka [mailto:enitka@twcny.rr.com]
Sent: 30 July 2002 14:13
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: RE: [Leica] 35mm Summilux-M


Rei - thanks for the post - an amazing amount of difference!

ernie

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Rei
Shinozuka
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 9:11 AM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: [Leica] 35mm Summilux-M


dante, just for you!

http://www.shinozuka-family.com/35summiluxen/

DISCLAIMER:  that there is NOTHING scientific or rigorous about this
test, i might also have screwed up focusing, exposing, developing,
scanning, reducing, sharpening, and/or downloading, the images.  but i think
it gets the idea across. :-)

- -rei

>

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html


- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the designated recipient(s) named above.  If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited.  This communication is for information purposes only and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or as a solicitation of an offer to buy any financial product, an official confirmation of any transaction, or as an official statement of Lehman Brothers.  Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free.  Therefore, we do not represent that this information is complete or accurate and it should not be relied upon as such.  All information is subject to change without notice.


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html