Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/07/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] TE and prime lenses
From: Peterson Arthur G NSSC <PetersonAG@NAVSEA.NAVY.MIL>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 16:33:24 -0400

		Oliver,

		Same with me!  Gotta keep the primes because, yes, there are
times when f/4 is not enough.  But I use those primes a lot less, as there
are many more times (e.g., with Tri-X, all but night time and indoors) when
f/4 is enough, and then the Tri-Elmar is very handy and convenient.

		Art Peterson


		-----Original Message-----
		From:	Steve Unsworth [mailto:mail@steveunsworth.co.uk]
		Sent:	Tuesday, July 23, 2002 4:14 PM
		To:	leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
		Subject:	RE: [Leica] TE and prime lenses

		Oliver

		I have both the primes (well, 35mm and 50mm by Leica, 28mm
by Voigtlander) and the Tri-Elmar. I have no intention of selling any of
them. There are times when f4 just isn't enough :-)

		Steve


		-----Original Message-----
		From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
		[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf
Of Oliver
		Bryk
		Sent: 23 July 2002 21:58
		To: Users Group Leica
		Subject: [Leica] TE and prime lenses

		Did users of prime lenses in the focal lengths of the
Tri-Elmar, who later bought a TE, continue to use these prime lenses or sell
them?
		Oliver Bryk Norton AntiVirus scans all my outgoing e-mail.

		
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html