Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/07/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Update on Nikon 8000ED scanner
From: Paul Chefurka <paul@chefurka.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 13:14:02 -0400
References: <pob4juc78aedoa2tp7t8ipdn00a9k040oj@4ax.com> <200207151032.g6FAWkj28150@panix3.panix.com> <fmu5ju8nkuii64ms0gtn92rm4la4sa1cvj@4ax.com>

On Mon, 15 Jul 2002 12:47:10 -0400, Paul Chefurka <paul@chefurka.com>
wrote:

>On Mon, 15 Jul 2002 06:32:46 -0400 (EDT), "Rei Shinozuka" <shino@panix.com>
>wrote:
>
>>good point.  what IS the impact on speed?  e.g., how long does it take
>>to scan in at 4000 dpi for 35mm and 6x6?  how big are the files and how
>>long does it take to bring up in PS?  
>>
>>thanks,
>>
>>-rei
>
>Here are the results from a test scan of a 35mm slide on my LS-4000 using
>Vuescan.  I scanned at 4000 dpi in 64-bit RGBI mode, set the infrared
>cleaning to medium intensity (I didn't use any other post-processing), and
>saved the file as an uncompressed 48-bit TIFF.  My computer is a PIII 800,
>with 768 MB
>
>The scan itself took 55 seconds.  Post-processing and saving the file to
>disk took 2:10, for a total scan time of 3:05.  The file was 111.5 MB.
>Opening it in PS7 took 7 seconds.

One more data point - the same scan without any IR cleaning took a total
time of 1:35 - :55 for the scan and :40 for the processing and save.  So
the cleaning added 90 seconds to the scan time.

Paul

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Paul Chefurka <paul@chefurka.com> (Re: [Leica] Update on Nikon 8000ED scanner)
Message from "Rei Shinozuka" <shino@panix.com> (Re: [Leica] Update on Nikon 8000ED scanner)
Message from Paul Chefurka <paul@chefurka.com> (Re: [Leica] Update on Nikon 8000ED scanner)