Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/07/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]How many times have we all gotten work through the door, and said no. And then went on to recommend someone whose shoot it was because it fit just what they were all about. Moreover, they could bring to the finished product something that they weren't even aware of, or that they been waiting for just such an opportunity. I'd say it's happened more than once with most of us. That the situation demanded a photographer who could rise to the occasion goes without saying. McNally, I think, has let his subjects down in two fundamental reasons. For one he doesn't understand the visual syntax in the portrayal of the worker. Secondly, and more pointedly he's utter inability to apprehend the historicity that emanates from his subjects. In this sense, yes, he was the wrong photographer. Slobodan Dimitrov "Sal DiMarco,Jr." wrote: > > LUGites, > There was a story in one of the photo fan magazines, American > Photographer, I think about the Joe McNally's shoot. > The photo were shot life size and each EXPOSURE cost $300.-- plus. > > "No doubt about that. That the wrong photographer used it. Or that it > was used for a pretty pointless purpose." > OK, you didn't like the photos, didn't like the display, didn't like the > idea or didn't like the excution, are all valid comments. > Saying the "wrong photographer" used the camera is pretty pointless. > Happy Snaps, > > Sal DiMarco, Jr. > Philadelphia, PA > Web Site: http://members.fcc.net/sal.dimarcojr > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html