Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/12/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] NOCTILUX-M f/1/50 mm
From: Dan Cardish <dcardish@sympatico.ca>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 23:01:33 -0500
References: <3C195A81.6030907@earthlink.net> <20011213195845.49859.qmail@web10206.mail.yahoo.com> <v04011703b83ed1d9e15e@[66.81.48.158]>
 
Over 50 posts made to the LUG in the past 24 hours had the word "Noctilux"
in one form or another in the subject header.   That's a lot of deleting to
do.

dan c.

At 07:19 PM 13-12-01 -0800, Guy Bennett wrote:
>The above is really childish. No one is inundating you personally with
>posts praising the Noctilux, and if you feel that way why not just delete
>them instead of harping on about the shortcomings of a lens that you've
>apparently not even used with any frequency if at all?

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
In reply to: Message from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] NOCTILUX-M f/1/50 mm)
Message from Mike Gil <dtt2150@yahoo.com> (Re: [Leica] NOCTILUX-M f/1/50 mm)
Message from Guy Bennett <gbennett@lainet.com> (Re: [Leica] NOCTILUX-M f/1/50 mm)