Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/11/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Leica made me a better photographer because it's a better camera - sorts of
From: "Mike Durling" <durling@widomaker.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 19:55:02 -0500
References: <01c16690$d5b7c980$00007ac3@mz>

I for one would like to see the test results for those two lenses.  I, too,
would expect the Leica to be better but the Nikkor 105/2.5 is an awfully
nice lens.

Mike D

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Mārtiņš Zelmenis" <martin@lrpv.lv>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 2:01 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Leica made me a better photographer because it's a
better camera - sorts of



Right - we shouldn't be slaves of our equipment.
I was figuring recently - where do Leicas fit in? For what photo purposes
they are best? Ms for candids/street photography - only? Nope; I've used
mine both for street photos and landscapes. I've used it for portraiture,
too, but not classical style - that would be a little short of challenge -
but maybe not (I don't expect to use it with lenses longer than 75mm - and
then I haven't got one). Rs for nature/landscape/portraiture/macro?
Partially - because nothing beats landscape shots on large format. On advice
of fellow LUGer Pablo Kolodny I comparatively tested Nikon 105/2.5 & Leica
90/2.8 lenses. Well, I am now figuring in what way to present the results
for you all to see - I haven't studied the archives; maybe these tests have
been done before. But one thing is certain. No matter how you put it, Leica
IS superior. I bow my head to its engineers and designers.
But then - does it mean I am getting rid of my Nikon - no.

So maybe them Leicas are best for being collector's items???        ;-))

Martin


Mārtiņš Zelmenis wrote:

"What I tried to say was: for me
nothing beats Leica - and Nikon Fs (I've got MF Nikons only). And I perfecty
understand - what works well for one person, doesn't work for another."

I think your second sentence here is the most important point. Some years
ago I had a very nice black plain prism F that I'd found in a pawn shop, and
I sold it for two reasons: 1) it was in far too good condition to remain in
the hands of a 'user' like me, it belonged with someone who would look after
it a bit better and 2) I had too many cameras and needed to have a clear
out. When it came to a choice between getting rid of the F or the Nikkormat
FT3, I had to admit that *for me* the FT3 was the more useful picture taking
machine.

- --
David Morton
dmorton@journalist.co.uk

"The more opinions you have, the less you see." -- Wim Wenders.
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] Leica made me a better photographer)
In reply to: Message from "Mārtiņš Zelmenis" <martin@lrpv.lv> (Re: [Leica] Leica made me a better photographer because it's a better camera - sorts of)