Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/09/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Neopan 1600
From: "james rabun" <rabun@dellepro.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 22:19:18 -0500
References: <20010921215654.30827.qmail@web12303.mail.yahoo.com> <3BABCC14.FFAB742@rabiner.cncoffice.com>

What is a good mail order source of Neopan 1600?
Thanks
Pat Rabun

- ----- Original Message -----
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 6:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Neopan 1600


> Steve Rowell wrote:
> >
> > Okay all you Neopan experts. I have a bunch of Neopan
> > 1600 that I want to shoot at 400 - 800. I noticed on
> > the Agfa web page, under the Rodinal processing chart
> > they recommend an effective speed of 640 for 1 + 50
> > processing. On other charts I've seen 1600 for the
> > same time and temp. Anybody know which is correct?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Steve Rowell
> >
> Sure but why the heck would  you want to shoot it at 400 or 800?
> You'll got dead on gorgeous negs at 1600 with full shadow detail.
> Have you been constantly getting negs which are thin in the shadows?
> There really is no other reason Steve!
> Over exposure is not pretty! :)
>
> You don't get a richer fuller more friendly neg. You get mush.
>
> All these options on these development charts are not supposed to get
your
> creative juices flowing.
> As I see it they are not creative options. It's babble.
> Each film as a certain speed with the developer you're using and you base
that
> speed on shadow detail.
> You don't just pick a nice sounding number and i think a lot of people do
that.
> "I KNOW!!! Acufine at 3200 1:4!!! Wow!!! WHAT A COMBINATION!!!"
> I would never do that.
>
> I assume the number on the box is correct and go out and do some
bracketing with
> my first roll and then make a stab at a development time. Try to make some
> prints and then go from there. Adjusting my development time accordingly.
If my
> shadows are thin then i reduce my fill speed. Such as Delta 3200 which is
1200
> in any developer I've used with it.
>
> Mark Rabiner
>
> Portland, Oregon
> USA
>
> http://www.rabiner.cncoffice.com/
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Steve Rowell <steverowell@yahoo.com> ([Leica] Neopan 1600)
Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] Neopan 1600)