Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/08/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] VF Magnifier
From: Pablo Kolodny <pkolodny@fibertel.com.ar>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 12:39:51 -0700

I agree with you B.D.
Every time I get focusing right with a 90 M lens I feel happy but I'd rather
be going for 90 R...
As said once upon a time my M system will fit more than fine if tuned up to
50 mm lens as the longest focal...from there and up I'll go for the R system
or better a nice Planar or Sonnar mounted on a cheap Contax body.

regards

- -- 
Pablo Kolodny
www.pablokolodny.com

> From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
> Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 10:50:26 -0400
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: Re: [Leica] VF Magnifier
> 
> The problem has nothing to do with the lens - the APO summicron - but
> rather has to do with using a 90 on a rangefinder with no magnification.
> I find that I can't focus accurately enough from more than about 10'
> away - and that's an estimate - because the image in the viewfinder is
> too small for me to differentiate facial or other features clearly. I
> can see a person's whole face 'snap' into focus, but whether I've really
> focused on the eye, the nose, the ears, I couldn't begin to tell you. So
> having a magnifier will make a world of difference for me. Without it, I
> have to use the reflex more than I really want to. The APO 90 is an
> awesome lens, in terms of its "finger print," and having the speed. But,
> focusing is pretty essential.
> 
> B. D.

Replies: Reply from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] VF Magnifier)