Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/08/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hello Pablo, Just for the recordI was not the author of thismessage. I only responded to the original post. Regards, Akhil On Fri, 17 Aug 2001, Pablo Kolodny wrote: > on 17/8/01 9:00 PM, Akhil Lal at alal@duke.poly.edu wrote: > > >> Does someone have information on this camera or a web > >> link. If someone has experience with this camera or > >> has compared Zeiss vs Leica glass. I have a project > >> im working on that requires multiple types of film. I > >> rather not purchase more Hasselblad backs and just do > >> the project with 35mm. > >> > >> Mike Gil > >> > > > I'd rather save my money or maybe would by thousands of hot dogs before > acquiring one of those Rolleis. I love the concept of that beautiful camera > but is a pain in the...you know. > The money you'd be saving for not buying extra Hasselblad mags. you'll waste > in buying these Rolleis like the 2000 or 3003 or... > I'd say that Rollei is TLR. And in second place the 6000 series but, again > 120 film. > But, at last you have other choice for the Zeiss glasses: Contax bodies. RTS > II will fit well your job, I guess. > > good luck > > Pablo > >