Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/08/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]How does the 80-200 f4 compare to the 4 year later ( also Minolta/Leica) 75-200 f4?? If you could get that at a good price.....is that also interesting? ?? Steve > I second that. The 80-200/4 is the only zoom I own. I'd hate to be without > it. I posted these shots the other day. All five were taken with the > 80-200/4 two weeks ago. > > http://www.lightcurves.com/images/jumper1.jpg > http://www.lightcurves.com/images/jumper3.jpg > http://www.lightcurves.com/images/jumper4.jpg > http://www.lightcurves.com/images/jumper5.jpg > http://www.lightcurves.com/images/jumper6.jpg > > Dave > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ken Wilcox [mailto:wilcox@tir.com] > Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 11:55 AM > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us; leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: [Leica] Re: Thoughts on R8s > > > Unless you need the speed, take a look at the 80-200 f4. It is a truly > amazing lens and inexpensive (for Leica) > > Ken Wilcox >