Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/08/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Tri-X 320...extended sensitivity in theshadows? Was- RE:[Leica] Re: Leica Users digest V20 #217
From: Rich Lahrson <tripspud@transbay.net>
Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2001 16:40:47 -0700
References: <3B6DB69E.B8468A2C@rabiner.cncoffice.com> <3.0.6.32.20010805180147.00a0a100@POP6.sympatico.ca>

Dan,

      I've had the same problem.  I've managed a routine in which the film
is attached to the reel in the dark.

                                                        Cheers,


Rich Lahrson

tripspud@transbay.net

Dan Cardish wrote:

> Actually, I always get the best shot on the final frame of 35mm film I've
> rolled myself, where the film was exposed to light at the end where it was
> attached to the spool.  And I know it's true because occasionally I can
> actually see part of the frame when I develop the film!
>
> dan c.
>
> At 06:46 PM 05-08-01 -0300, Pablo Kolodny wrote:
> >
> >Lots of times when working in Studio, let's say for a dance job where we
> >plan in advance every shot and ask for the dancers to move themselves like
> >this or like that way, we achieve the best shot at the 13th frame when using
> >120 and at the 25th when 220.-

In reply to: Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: Tri-X 320...extended sensitivity in the shadows? Was- RE: [Leica] Re: Leica Users digest V20 #217)
Message from Dan Cardish <dcardish@sympatico.ca> (Re: [Leica] Re: Tri-X 320...extended sensitivity in the shadows? Was- RE:[Leica] Re: Leica Users digest V20 #217)