Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/08/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] mxsmanic and pinholes
From: "Daniel Post" <dpost@triad.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2001 15:41:40 -0400
References: <9AB0703A010C0160@smtp-gate.mottmac.com> <OE24nQIrGC5V7GhaDLe000016b9@hotmail.com>

Re your chromatic abberations- take a look at Huyghen's work- while slightly
bereft of mathematical background, he did describe his experiments with a
'pinhole' and how the action of diffraction around the edge of an object can
cause a color fringing becasue of the differing amount of diffraction of
different colors of light.... Boy, this physics stuff is neat, but I think
the dog ate my sliderule, so I can only be accurate to two significant
figures!!!
Dan
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Mxsmanic" <mxsmanic@hotmail.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2001 8:13 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] mxsmanic and pinholes


> Malcolm writes:
>
> > I know that it is a relatively minor disadvantage,
> > but aren't pinholes just a little bit restricted
> > by their inability to focus rays of light?
>
> No.  Everything seen through a pinhole is always in focus, no matter where
the
> image plane resides, and no matter what it's shape or orientation.  In
fact,
> with a curved film plane, you can eliminate fall-off on the edges of the
frame.
> By moving the film plane in other ways, you can change perspective.  None
of
> this requires any change in the pinhole, which provides a focused image
under
> all conditions.
>
> I have read that pinholes do exhibit some chromatic aberration, but I
haven't
> found out the mechanism of that thus far.
>

In reply to: Message from Malcolm McCullough <MM4@mm-croy.mottmac.com> ([Leica] mxsmanic and pinholes)
Message from "Mxsmanic" <mxsmanic@hotmail.com> (Re: [Leica] mxsmanic and pinholes)