Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/08/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 07:07 PM 8/1/01 +0200, Mxsmanic wrote: >I'm not sure what industry you have in mind, but it has been the years I've >spent in photography that taught me how prevalent 35mm is, and now digital is >becoming very prevalent, too. Some old-world editors may still prefer MF, but >since MF quality cannot be reproduced on even the best magazine covers, it is a >pointless anachronism. Well, such quality CAN be reproduced on even the best magazine covers, if they choose to invest the money in process work. But most magazine illustrations, cover and inside, are now digitally generated, so your basic proposition -- that the quality IS lost -- stands. Marc msmall@roanoke.infi.net FAX: +540/343-7315 Cha robh bąs fir gun ghrąs fir!