Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/08/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]le 1/08/01 2:59, Mark Rabiner à mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com a écrit : > Mxsmanic wrote: >> <Snip> >> >> MF certainly provides potentially greater image quality than 35mm, but that >> does >> not mean that the difference can actually be seen under most viewing >> conditions. >> If the difference were so consistently obvious and large, 35mm would not be >> the >> leading format today. > > Often MF is used because of it's impact on the light table. How it looks > mounted > in those black cardboard presentation things. > And it's ability to be checked with a Polaroid of a size you can see. > Or the exact aspect ration of it's shape is what is wanted. Squares for > instance > to name an extreme example. > 6x7 another. They just like the shape of the thing. > The way it ends up printing or reproducing can be almost an afterthought. > Not that I don't appreciate it. I very much do. > > And they really go WOW when they see 4x5" on the light table... Tarek