Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/07/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]RG, Looking back, I now see what you were driving at, though your raw search method yields a flawed result. The totals of the brands come out (in favor of your argument) higher than the total pages, You also left out poor Koni-Omega with 19 entries, and probably others. But then, some of the 2740 pages I found were Russian and Chinese pages that had nothing to do with photography. One is about a guy's dog that is named "Bokeh" Regards, SonC - ----- Original Message ----- From: "r g" <photos@nyc.rr.com> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:24 PM Subject: Re: [Leica] Bokeh.. bah! > I use google.com as the "great leveller" in determining correlations. > Throughly circumstantial but renders the idea that bokeh is a semantic leica > construction a spurious argument. > > Bokeh 3030 pages total. > Olympus 1060, Nikon 888, Canon 753, Leica 654, Pentax 512, Tamron 469, > Contax 435, Hasselblad 210, Mamiya 190 > > rg > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ted Grant" <tedgrant@home.com> > > I never heard reference of the bokah thing until someone came up with it > on > > the LUG some years ago. > >