Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/07/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Simon Lamb wrote: > > Does anyone have any opinion/real world experience of the merits of using > Neopan at its rated speed versus Delta 3200 rated at 1600. Usual things > such as contrast, sharpness, degree of grain etc. I will be working in some > very low light next week and I have visited the venue and can get some away > with 1/30sec to 1/60sec with my Noctilux using 1600ASA film. > > Thanks. > > Simon With Xtol it is a half stop slower I've found than Neopan so i only shoot it in 120. Also Neopan may just be really a superior film and for less money. It's so rare when you pay less to get more but it does happen. Mark Rabiner Portland, Oregon USA http://www.rabiner.cncoffice.com/