Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/07/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Fuji Neopan 1600 vs Ilford Delta 3200 @ 1600
From: "Steve LeHuray" <icommag@toad.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 11:58:57 -0500

> Does anyone have any opinion/real world experience of the merits of using
> Neopan at its rated speed versus Delta 3200 rated at 1600.  Usual things
> such as contrast, sharpness, degree of grain etc.  I will be working in some
> very low light next week and I have visited the venue and can get some away
> with 1/30sec to 1/60sec with my Noctilux using 1600ASA film.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Simon
>

Simon,

Have never used Neopan or Delta 3200, but here are two shots with delta 400
rated at 1600:

http://www.streetphoto.net/photo_of_the_week/wk26.jpg

http://www.streetphoto.net/photo_of_the_week/wk26a.jpg

Summilux 50/1.4 shot at 60th and f1.4

sl

Replies: Reply from "Simon Lamb" <simon@sclamb.com> (Re: [Leica] Fuji Neopan 1600 vs Ilford Delta 3200 @ 1600)