Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/07/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Phil Marcus wrote: > After reading much about the trials and tribs of the 90mm Tele-Elmarit and > witnessing several specimens giving home and comfort to a variety of flora > and fauna, I bought a relatively clean model. > > I, too, felt the lens could be sharper. It looked clean under close > inspection, but there were marks indicating someone had used a caliper > (poorly) to get inside. Sherry Krauter cleaned the lens and sent it back to > me, and I just had the results of my first test of the cleaned lens > processed. > > The result of the cleaning is nothing short of incredible! Where the lens > once was flat, it's contrasty and saturated. I was fooled by a layer of > slime! It informally tests as a rather nice piece of glass. Maybe not a new > Summicron, but closer than I would have thought. I recommend a good cleaning > to anyone who has one that produces slightly flat pictures. My guess is that > the "variance in production quality" and fungus and lubrication travel > problems might be one in the same. I have always though of John Van Stelton for lens work and Sherry for the body. Anyone know if for just lens cleaning if it makes a difference? My thinking on JVS is that after disassembly and reassembly testing and adjustment might require specialized optical instruments. Maybe, if needed, Sherry has those too. I wonder if a 'tune up' by either might improve a brand new lens delivered by Leica. Dennis