Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/07/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]B+W and Heliopan are both premium filters. There is basically no difference in optical qualities. B+W makes the best overall assortment of filter types and sizes. For an R8, you want a circular polarizer, not a Kaesemann. A Kaesemann filter is linear and hermetically sealed. Actually the best in terms of durability but very expensive and not circular in construction. Buy a B+W E60 circular polarizer. Multicoated if you wish. Jim At 09:26 AM 7/2/01 -0500, Tom.Henson@bakerbotts.com wrote: >Good morning all. > >I am getting ready to go on vacation to sunny Palm Beach and Miami in a >couple of weeks and have been trying to find a Heliopan Circular Polarizer >filter for my R8 in size 60e. > >I find that the price of the Leica filter is just too high and thought I >would be able to find a good quality alternative. I choose Heliopan first >because I understand that they actually make the Leica filter, but have also >searched the web for B&W in that size as well. > >I can not seem to find the Heliopan available in the 60e size. I have a >feeling that Leica has some kind of agreement not to market this size in the >US. I don't know it just seems very hard to find this size. I did manage to >find one site that sells them but I don't know the difference between a >regular circular polarizer and a Kasemann polarizer other than the Kasemann >is a lot more expensive. > >I did search through the archives and found some information that seems to >lead toward the Heliopan being the better since they use a slim mount vs. >B&W. I do plan on using this filter on an 28-70 vario and an 80-200 vario. I >am concerned about vignetting on the 28-70. > >I have found many sites that list the B&W brand in that size. Both in the >regular and Kasemann. > >Question: anyone want to offer an opinion on the quality difference between >the two? B&W seems to be less expensive. Should I go ahead and spend the >extra money for the Kasemann? Especially if I plan on using it next to the >ocean? Or, should I just breakdown and spend the money and buy the Leica and >be done with it? > >Any help of this subject would be much appreciated and I thank all in >advance for their advice and help. > >Tom Henson >Houston