Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/07/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Good morning all. I am getting ready to go on vacation to sunny Palm Beach and Miami in a couple of weeks and have been trying to find a Heliopan Circular Polarizer filter for my R8 in size 60e. I find that the price of the Leica filter is just too high and thought I would be able to find a good quality alternative. I choose Heliopan first because I understand that they actually make the Leica filter, but have also searched the web for B&W in that size as well. I can not seem to find the Heliopan available in the 60e size. I have a feeling that Leica has some kind of agreement not to market this size in the US. I don't know it just seems very hard to find this size. I did manage to find one site that sells them but I don't know the difference between a regular circular polarizer and a Kasemann polarizer other than the Kasemann is a lot more expensive. I did search through the archives and found some information that seems to lead toward the Heliopan being the better since they use a slim mount vs. B&W. I do plan on using this filter on an 28-70 vario and an 80-200 vario. I am concerned about vignetting on the 28-70. I have found many sites that list the B&W brand in that size. Both in the regular and Kasemann. Question: anyone want to offer an opinion on the quality difference between the two? B&W seems to be less expensive. Should I go ahead and spend the extra money for the Kasemann? Especially if I plan on using it next to the ocean? Or, should I just breakdown and spend the money and buy the Leica and be done with it? Any help of this subject would be much appreciated and I thank all in advance for their advice and help. Tom Henson Houston