Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/06/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Tri-X vs T-Max
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 19:09:25 -0700
References: <E75C3A130E1ED3119BD400508B4AA23B027D21CC@exgau36004.mel085spr.au.anz> <3B392925.F8CE537E@rabiner.cncoffice.com> <20010626212834.R23426@oven.com>

Jeff Moore wrote:
> 
> 2001-06-26-20:30:30 Mark Rabiner:
> > But they are well worth it. Both the Delta and the Kodak T grain films.
> 
> So...  have you made your peace with the newfangled Delta 400?  Do you
> think it's swell, or wish they'd never screwed with it?

The new stuff i don't know from yet. I can't see them screwing it up. I've got
more faith in Ilford.

But i do like the Neopan 1600 better than Ilfords delta 3200 which is think is
slower and cost too much.

And i expect to like Fuji ACROS about as much or more than the delta 100 I've
been using for my high res occasions.


Mark Rabiner

Portland, Oregon
USA

http://www.rabiner.cncoffice.com/

In reply to: Message from "Griffith, Lucian" <griffil1@anz.com> ([Leica] Tri-X vs T-Max)
Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] Tri-X vs T-Max)
Message from Jeff Moore <jbm@oven.com> ([Leica] Re: Tri-X vs T-Max)