Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2001/06/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: 80-200 flare (was:Re: Copyright questions)
From: "Eric" <ericm@pobox.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 08:58:59 -0500
References: <20010623200411.19887.cpmta@c014.sfo.cp.net> <OE70ZVrDs9aAOPpBpcX00000bec@hotmail.com>
Mxsmanic:
>I'd guess that the Leica came out on top, since it costs more than twice as much
>as the AF-S 80-200/2.8. Probably 10%-20% better
I thought you said that Nikon's top glass was just as expensive as Leica's,
and that pictures between the two were indistinguishable from one another.
I must have misunderstood, or I'm not remembering accurately.
Eric
Replies:
Reply from "Mxsmanic" <mxsmanic@hotmail.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: 80-200 flare (was:Re: Copyright questions))
In reply to:
Message from Doug Herr <telyt@earthlink.net> (80-200 flare (was:Re: [Leica] Copyright questions))
Message from "Mxsmanic" <mxsmanic@hotmail.com> (Re: 80-200 flare (was:Re: [Leica] Copyright questions))