Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/06/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Home depot and the rest
From: "Bryan Caldwell" <bcaldwell@softcom.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 10:12:29 -0700
References: <NABBLIJOIFAICKBIEPJJKELIKEAA.darkroom@ix.netcom.com>
 
Austin,

Municpal Code violations are not prosecuted by the District Attorney's
office, so they are still free to fight "real crime." They are, instead,
prosecuted by the City Attorney's office.

Would you prefer that trespassing not be criminal?

Bryan




- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@ix.netcom.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2001 9:34 AM
Subject: RE: [Leica] Home depot and the rest


>
> > I did some checking and I was right - at least in California - where
local
> > municipal codes specify both loitering and trespassing as
> > criminal offenses.
>
> Amazing!  I guess it's easier to bust someone for loitering and
trespassing
> than to fight real crime.  What's the penalty for chewing gum on Sunday?
>
In reply to: Message from "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@ix.netcom.com> (RE: [Leica] Home depot and the rest)