Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/06/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Home depot and the rest
From: Jim Brick <jim@brick.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 22:02:01 -0700
References: <000f01c0fa95$c2bcd440$05fea8c0@ameritech.net> <001101c0fa99$9d7c8e60$953d18d1@PACBELL.NET>

At 06:17 AM 6/22/01 +0200, Mxsmanic wrote:
>
>All well and good, but how was the owner of the hobby store harmed by
this?  And
>why couldn't the individual have done exactly the same thing with pictures
taken
>from the exterior?
> 
>
>Why was it okay for you to take photographs, but not okay for them to
videotape?
>And why would anyone have a reasonable expectation of privacy outside the
store?
> 
>
>When is taking photographs in a store a criminal activity?
> 


OK Mxsmanic, fess up. You are really an alias for Austin...

;)

Jim

Replies: Reply from Brian Reid <reid@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> (Re: [Leica] Re: Home depot and the rest)
In reply to: Message from "Andy Sparaco" <asparaco@metafour.net> ([Leica] Home depot and the rest)
Message from "Tom Schofield" <tdschofield@email.msn.com> (Re: [Leica] Home depot and the rest)