Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/06/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] PAW 24 (Nathan)
From: "Ken Iisaka" <ken@iisaka.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 21:52:53 -0700
References: <B7562190.1DF1B%gilplant@earthlink.net> <00a401c0f995$d8af8a00$56234d18@gv.shawcable.net> <088001c0f9a3$51a61c00$e904c53f@pacbell.net> <3B310299.3825B967@webshuttle.ch>
 
You know, I cannot argue with your stance.  However, the contrast between
the couple and the man was the first thing I noticed, and I actually didn't
notice the red light until Ted pointed out...

Great shot, anyway.

From: "Nathan Wajsman" <wajsman@webshuttle.ch>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 1:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] PAW 24 (Nathan)

> Hi Ken,
>
> Undoubtedly your corrected version is better. But...it is no longer my
picture,
> because removing the red light in PS crosses the line that I have imposed
on
> myself (and I repeat, on myself, I have no desire to impose my rules on
others).
>
> Nathan
In reply to: Message from Gilbert Plantinga <gilplant@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] PAW 24 (Nathan))
Message from "Ted Grant" <tedgrant@home.com> (Re: [Leica] PAW 24 (Nathan))
Message from "Ken Iisaka" <ken@iisaka.org> (Re: [Leica] PAW 24 (Nathan))
Message from Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch> (Re: [Leica] PAW 24 (Nathan))