Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/06/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Herbert & Lee Kanner wrote: > > Yes, I would really love to see this question taken into the courts. > I understand restrictions on tripods where they could interfere with > pedestrian traffic (e.g. N.Y. Times Square), or present a nuisance > and hazard, as in a museum. But the notion that if you are on a > tripod, you are a professional photographer and are going to use the > pictures commercially should be challenged. > > One friend was kicked off what appeared to her to be a public > sidewalk by a private security guard because she was trying to > photograph the building of Oracle, the software firm in Redwood > Shores, CA. Another friend told me that if they think you are a > professional, they won't permit you to take photographs in any public > park in San Jose, CA unless you pay something like $45 for a permit > that is valid for only a few hours. Under what authority does the city of San Jose attempt to restrict one's right to take photographs in a public park? jh