Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/06/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] OT: was Metol, now D23
From: Johnny Deadman <john@pinkheadedbug.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 09:39:07 -0400
 
on 6/11/01 8:36 AM, D Khong at dkhong@pacific.net.sg wrote:

> Friends,
> 
> Is there a website where I can find out more about developing times for D23
> and Ilford HP5+?

    http://www.digitaltruth.com/photo/devchart.html

This doesn't seem to have times for D23. In general, I recommend doing your
own testing for D23 as many of the numbers you will find on the web are what
I would consider on the low side...equivalent to an N-1 development.

There is a very interesting discussion of D23 on Lloyld Erlich's excellent
site, with some numbers:

    http://www.heylloyd.com/technicl/D23.html

I would use D23 a LOT more if it wasn't for the metol issue.
- -- 
John Brownlow

http://www.pinkheadedbug.com
Replies: Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] OT: was Metol, now D23)