Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/06/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Sorry for the sending error. I am getting back to some telephotography. For many years was using 280/4.8 Telyt on Visoflex. Sold both 6-8 years ago. For SLR work, I have had an R6 for some years and have been limited to the 135/2.8 Elmarit, occasionally with the 2X extender. I want a 180; it's a very useful focal length and, with the extender, gives that much more reach, almost a 400mm. I cannot justify the new Apo-Elmarit at over $3,000, a bit less used, and wouldn't want the 180 Summicron; apart the price it's simply too heavy and bulky. The old 180/4 has a great weight/size advantage - important to me - and I could probably live with the f/8 extender speed - others live comfortably with the 400/6.8. My question has to do with the optical quality of the f/4 compared with that of the 180/2.8 lenses, both alone and with the extender. Given the constraints of purse, limiting me to these lenses, optical performance is what concerns me most. Incidentally, I had been considering the 180/3.4, a truly excellent lens, but have heard that it does not perform well with either the normal (understandable) or the apo extender (not quite so understandable). Help. Seth LaK 9