Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/06/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]- ----- Original Message ----- From: "onetreehillclw" <onetreehillclw@compaq.net> To: <leica@topica.com> Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 9:42 PM Subject: Elmar-M 50/2.8 > I just purchased a new Elmar-M 50/2.8. I have used the old Elmar on my M3 > for awhile. I have shot one roll of Fuji RMS at 100 and a roll of XP2. This > is truly a great lens at the lowest > Leica price. I purchased mine for only $500 through a Hong Kong dealer with > the 2 yr lens warranty. > > The new lens diffently out performs the old lens. I believe its sharper and > has better contrast(but not too much contrast!) > Now my old lens(1964) does have some coating marks and some cleaning marks > so its not mint. But this new glass! Man! > > My question is......both lenses are 4 elements in 3 groups. > Is it the coating on the new lens that makes it better? I guess > in B&W you can't tell too much, but in color its makes a BIG difference. I > won't get rid of my old lens, but this new 50 will get to stay for awhile on > one of my M3's. To critize the new lens, I like the old focusing ring better > than the new one. > > Anyone else ever compared the two? > > Chris Williams > New Orleans > >